 |
| |
Plan Vivo
Introduction
Plan
Vivo (PV) is an Offset Project Method for small scale LULUCF
projects with a focus on promoting sustainable
development and improving rural livelihoods and
ecosystems. PV works very closely with rural
communities, emphasizes participatory design, ongoing
stakeholder consultation, and the use of native species. The PV
Foundation certifies and issues only exante credits,
called Plan Vivo Certificates, and therefore does not
verify ex-post offsets.
History
of Standard
The
PV System was initiated in 1994 for a research project in
southern Mexico. The system was developed by the
Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management
(ECCM,
http://www.eccm.uk.com/), a consulting company
that focuses on climate change mitigation strategies
and policies, in partnership with El Colegio de la
Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), the University of Edinburgh and other
local organisations with funding from the UK Department
for International Development (DFID).
Administrative
Bodies
PV
is currently managed by the Plan Vivo Foundation
(formerly BioClimate Research and
Development), a non-profit focused on promoting actions to
reconcile human development and
environmental change. The Foundation reviews and registers projects
according to the PV System, issues PV
Certificates annually following the submission
and approval of each project’s annual report,
and acts as overall ‘keeper’ of the PV System
which is periodically reviewed in consultation with
projects and other stakeholders. It also approves
third-party verifiers and registers resellers of PV
Certificates.
Consultants are
hired by PV to review certain aspects of
their projects. Because of the small number of projects,
there is no established procedure for this. The PV
Foundation also conducts frequent field visits to
projects in order to monitor their progress and see that
evaluations are done as needed.
Project Developers:
Plan Vivo works with local NGOs who
function as project developers (‘project
coordinators’). They coordinate sales with the offset purchasers
and administer payments to local farmers based on
the achievement of ‘monitoring targets’.
Financing of
the Standard Organisation
The
financing of the PV Foundation is sourced primarily
from a levy imposed on the issuance of PV
Certificates. They currently take USD 0.30 per tonne of carbon
dioxide sold. Other sources of income come from
project and resellers’ registration fees.
Recognition
of Other Standards
PV
does not currently work in conjunction with other
standards.
Number
of Projects
Plan
Vivo currently has three projects (in Mexico, Uganda and
Mozambique) and a few more are currently being
reviewed.
Comments
on Plan Vivo
Grass-Roots
Approach - PV is a
small standard organisation that works closely with rural communities.
Because of the
grass-roots approach of PV, conservation and community benefits are very high, yet
standards of this type usually remain small because they are very
costly compared to cheap
carbon options available on a globally traded carbon market. It is
likely that PV will stay
small and not grow its portfolio beyond a handful of projects.
Ex-Ante
Offsets - Farmers
who participate in PV are paid in regular installments over 10-15 years, yet they
are expected to keep their trees standing for many decades.
PV’s offset
calculations are based on the trees remaining standing for decades
after payments have ceased.
Once all payments have been made to the farmers, there are no
repercussions for
farmers who decide to cut their trees down. PV argues that the threat
of noncompliance is largely
mitigated through their project design: all Plan Vivo projects strive to improve
the livelihoods of farmers and it is therefore in their own (economic)
interest to keep the
trees standing even after offset payments have ceased. The
authors welcome PV’s multi-benefit, grassroots approach that
aims to help the very
poorest, something that many larger offset projects and the CDM as a
whole have so far failed
to do (Schneider, 2007). Yet ex-ante credits cannot guarantee that
actual emissions reductions
will be realized. This should be clearly communicated to prospective
buyers: PV projects
have high co-benefits but the carbon offsets are less secure than with
ex-post credits.
Source:
WWF Germany, March 2008, Making Sense of the Voluntary Carbon Market: A
Comparison of Carbon Offset Standards, Anja Kollmuss (SEI-US), Helge
Zink (Tricorona), Clifford Polycarp (SEI-US). Full report is available
as a PDF here.
go from Plan Vivo back to Voluntary Carbon Market

|
|