 |
| |
Plan Vivo
Introduction
Plan
Vivo (PV) is an Offset Project Method for small scale
LULUCF
projects with a focus on promoting sustainable
development and improving rural livelihoods and
ecosystems. PV works very closely with rural
communities, emphasizes participatory design, ongoing
stakeholder consultation, and the use of native species. The
PV
Foundation certifies and issues only exante
credits,
called Plan Vivo Certificates, and therefore
does not
verify ex-post offsets.
History
of Standard
The
PV System was initiated in 1994 for a research
project in
southern Mexico. The system was developed by
the
Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management
(ECCM,
http://www.eccm.uk.com/), a consulting
company
that focuses on climate change mitigation
strategies
and policies, in partnership with El Colegio de la
Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), the University of Edinburgh and
other
local organisations with funding from the UK
Department
for International Development (DFID).
Administrative
Bodies
PV
is currently managed by the Plan Vivo
Foundation
(formerly BioClimate Research and
Development), a non-profit focused on promoting
actions to
reconcile human development and
environmental change. The Foundation reviews and registers projects
according to the PV System,
issues PV
Certificates annually following the
submission
and approval of each project’s annual
report,
and acts as overall ‘keeper’ of the PV
System
which is periodically reviewed in consultation
with
projects and other stakeholders. It also approves
third-party verifiers and registers resellers of PV
Certificates.
Consultants
are
hired by PV to review certain
aspects of
their projects. Because of the small number of
projects,
there is no established procedure for this. The PV
Foundation also conducts frequent field visits to
projects in order to monitor their progress and see
that
evaluations are done as needed.
Project
Developers:
Plan Vivo works with local
NGOs who
function as project developers (‘project
coordinators’). They coordinate sales with the offset
purchasers
and administer payments to local farmers
based on
the achievement of ‘monitoring targets’.
Financing of
the Standard Organisation
The
financing of the PV Foundation is sourced
primarily
from a levy imposed on the issuance of PV
Certificates. They currently take USD 0.30 per tonne of
carbon
dioxide sold. Other sources of income come
from
project and resellers’ registration fees.
Recognition
of Other Standards
PV
does not currently work in conjunction with
other
standards.
Number
of Projects
Plan
Vivo currently has three projects (in Mexico,
Uganda and
Mozambique) and a few more are currently
being
reviewed.
Comments
on Plan Vivo
Grass-Roots
Approach -
PV is a
small standard organisation that works closely with rural communities.
Because of
the
grass-roots approach of PV, conservation and community benefits are very
high, yet
standards of this type usually remain small because they are very
costly compared to
cheap
carbon options available on a globally traded carbon market. It is
likely that PV
will stay
small and not grow its portfolio beyond a handful of projects.
Ex-Ante
Offsets -
Farmers
who participate in PV are paid in regular installments over 10-15 years, yet
they
are expected to keep their trees standing for many decades.
PV’s offset
calculations are based on the trees remaining standing for decades
after payments have
ceased.
Once all payments have been made to the farmers, there are no
repercussions for
farmers who decide to cut their trees down. PV argues that the threat
of noncompliance is
largely
mitigated through their project design: all Plan Vivo projects strive to
improve
the livelihoods of farmers and it is therefore in their own (economic)
interest to
keep the
trees standing even after offset payments have ceased. The
authors welcome PV’s multi-benefit, grassroots approach that
aims to help the
very
poorest, something that many larger offset projects and the CDM as a
whole have so far
failed
to do (Schneider, 2007). Yet ex-ante credits cannot guarantee that
actual emissions
reductions
will be realized. This should be clearly communicated to prospective
buyers: PV
projects
have high co-benefits but the carbon offsets are less secure than with
ex-post
credits.
Source:
WWF Germany, March 2008, Making Sense of the Voluntary Carbon Market: A
Comparison of Carbon Offset Standards, Anja Kollmuss (SEI-US), Helge
Zink (Tricorona), Clifford Polycarp (SEI-US). Full report is available
as a PDF here.
go from Plan Vivo back to Voluntary Carbon Market

|
|